Talk:Maltreatment

rule to be proposed to english administrators and users of wikipedia
REASONS:
 * 1) Definition of maltreatment in the wiktionary: the act or behaviour of treating someone cruelly, especially involving hurting a person or animal
 * 2) Note that: this is a monosemic and synonymical definition and essentially the same in French, Spanish and Italian.
 * 3) synonymical Wikipedia #redirect english maltreatment --> to: abuse

Comparing the definitions of the following 4 English monolingual dictionaries (Cambridge, Collins, Longman, WordNet) the concepts expressed by the english definitional terminology are the following: 1 treatment (object of action or behaviour) 2 cruelty or inhumanity (mode of action) 3 injury or hurting (effect of action) 4 person or animal (recipients of the action)
 * COMPARISON:
 * RESULT OF COMPARISON: same words and concept are expressed by foreign monolingual dictionaries :

The consequence is that certainly for centuries these words have been interlinguistic synonyms
 * 1) italian definitional terminology of MALTRATTAMENTO
 * 2) spanish definitional terminology of MALTRATO
 * 3) french definitional terminology of MALTRAITANCE

This is a case of ambiguous redirection that has taken the place of a necessary disambiguation in compliance with the wikipedia interlinguistic principle. All cases like this harm the reader and violate the principle of disambiguation. Therefore I propose that the following rule be made explicit and shared if it is not already written:
 * ARGUMENT: The #redirections of maltreatment to abuse make confusing the french reader that comes in english from MALTRATAINCE, as well as and the Spanish reader that comes from MALTRATO, as well as the italian reader that come from MALTRATTAMENTO.

"RULE PROPOSED: 'disambiguation is necessary and mandatory in all cases of interlinguistic monosemy and synonymity between at least 3 languages'"

Of course, the rule must apply to all Wikipedia languages, to be consistent with mutual respect between interlinguistic readers.
 * In the present case (monosemy e synonymity of the word MALTREATMENT) there is perfect monosemy and synonymity between english, french, spanish and italian. Therefore disambiguation is essential to ensure the interlinguistic character of the encyclopaedia
 * Those who are against this rule harm, whether intentional or involuntary, make a damage to the interlinguistic character based on the common lexicon, and make a favor to monolingualism and lexical reductions. What do you think about it ?

Opening the discussion about proposed rule
First i PING who has reverted my edit, making persistent the redirection to abuse.
 * HI, what do you think about
 * Grazie for your answer --Pasquale Di Massa (talk) 18:13, 1 August 2023 (UTC)


 * Redirects are not expected to be consistent across language projects. The rule you're proposing goes against the autonomy of the separate linguistic projects to make their own decisions about content organization, and is contrary to established disambiguation guidelines on each of the English, French, Italian, and Spanish Wikipedia projects:
 * English: [disambiguation pages are] also not an interlanguage dictionary
 * Spanish: Las acepciones (títulos desambiguados) a colocar en la página de desambiguación se deben colocar solo por homonimia (cuando las palabras presentan la misma forma gráfica o fonética, o muy similares, pero se refieren a distintas entidades)
 * French: Une page d'homonymie n'est pas non plus un article du wiktionnaire : elle n'est pas censée définir ou lister des termes courants du langage...Les « liens interlangues sur la gauche de la page » (faisant partie des métadonnées d'une page d'homonymie) ne devraient pointer que vers les pages d'homonymie équivalentes dans d'autres langues
 * Italian Da NON mettere [nelle pagine della disambiguazione]...Traduzioni
 * signed,Rosguill talk 19:03, 1 August 2023 (UTC)