Talk:Mamangam (film)

Semi-protected edit request on 8 June 2019
Add to the category section: 80.6.232.155 (talk) 13:16, 8 June 2019 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done NiciVampireHeart 22:11, 8 June 2019 (UTC)

Semi-protected edit request on 9 June 2019
• Please change the writer and screenplay credits in the infobox from Sajeev Pillai to Shanker Ramakrishnan because it is shown so in the official first look poster of the film.

• Please change the cinematographer credit in the infobox from Ganesh Rajavelu to Manoj Pillai because it is shown so in the official first look poster of the film.

• Please change the editor credit in the infobox from Sreekar Prasad to Raja Mohammed because it is shown so in the official first look poster of the film.

• It is given in the lead that "Kaecha Khamphakdee is choreographing the stunts of the film." But in the official first look poster of the film the stunt choreographer is credited as Sham Kaushal. Citing the references in the mentioned line it is understood that Kaecha Khamphakdee is also part of the film. Therefore the line should be corrected as "Sham Kaushal and Kaecha Khamphakdee are choreographing the stunts of the film." LycoMinds (talk) 07:16, 9 June 2019 (UTC)
 * Pending-protection-unlocked.svg Not done: The page's protection level has changed since this request was placed. You should now be able to edit the page yourself. If you still seem to be unable to, please reopen the request with further details. DannyS712 (talk) 10:01, 10 June 2019 (UTC)

Request for page protection
Please protect the page from vandalism. There are many non registered user are deliberately making distractions. So please do necessary action against this. SmakTwone (talk) 08:46, 6 November 2019 (UTC)

The collection of the movie has been edited again and again so plz avoid doing this and plz enter the correct box office collections of all Mammootty movies Krishna Nidhish (talk) 09:16, 21 December 2019 (UTC)

Wikipedia is not for endorsing Mammootty films by adding exaggerated figures claimed by the producers. Mamangam has not even grossed close to Ittymaani: Made in China in overseas markets, per comScore and Box Office Mojo. 137.97.77.34 (talk) 10:06, 22 December 2019 (UTC)

Semi-protected edit request on 15 December 2019
Could you add these reviews:

India Today said the film "tries to tell the fictionalised story of chaverukal (suicide squad). While it manages to achieve it to an extent, the film is not a wholesome experience" and "the stunt sequences are hard to believe" and the "VFX is tacky".

Rating 1.5 out of 5, The News Minute called it a dull and "tedious underwhelming film", writing that "Mamangam gives the distinct feel of watching a mega serial. The stunts don't look realistic at all, with the warriors flying in the air as if they were playing a quidditch match on invisible broomsticks" and "Mammootty has a faintly regretful expression on his face, as if he's realised that he's walked into yet another bad film". Huffpost wrote "The making is distinctly old school, with stagey production, wordy dialogues and tediously framed action scenes ... While there are moments that hold our interest (the narrative is familiar), one wishes the characters were more well-written. Mammootty's character—Chandroth Valya Panicker— is the most underwhelming period hero ever", also criticised the "bad writing", inorganic stunts and amateur VFX.

The Indian Express wrote, "A movie that could have narrated an intriguing story of suicidal warriors from Malabar region during the 18th century has turned out to be a collage of old school Malayalam stunt scenes, and cringe-inducing situations and dialogues which make you feel like you are watching a Malayalam serial ... the movie fails to live up to viewers expectations as it is let down by the amateurish approach to the screenplay and direction" and rated 2.5 stars out of 5. Firstpost wrote "Thematic relevance, courage and sensitivity are not enough to hold up an entire film though when the writing is shallow and the storytelling style dull. These twin problem areas combined with action scenes and visual effects that are a mixed bag end up pulling down Mamangam". Deccan Herald said it has good script, but bad acting and direction, stating "Mamangam is so bad that it looks like a satire on the period drama genre ... The film brings out the worst in Mammootty. It is as if the director picked out his worst facets and strung them together into a sequence". 2409:4073:498:2804:B83A:B7B8:38E4:3FC1 (talk) 09:23, 15 December 2019 (UTC)
 * ✅ Partially. Indian Express's review has been added. Other sources are not regarded as reliable source. Tolly  4  bolly  10:41, 15 December 2019 (UTC)
 * Added. Are reliable and widely used newspapers in Wikipedia. Continental Rift (talk) 12:18, 15 December 2019 (UTC)
 * Request: Cross link to Mamankam festival and Maamaankam (1979)

Semi-protected edit request on 7 February 2020
106.206.63.149 (talk) 18:54, 7 February 2020 (UTC) Collection is 135 crore not 32 crore, please make the rectification
 * Red information icon with gradient background.svg Not done: please provide reliable sources that support the change you want to be made. Eggishorn (talk) (contrib) 19:29, 7 February 2020 (UTC)

Semi-protected edit request on 23 August 2021
The film does not have a box office collection of 100 crores. It's just about 30-40 crores. 59.92.163.114 (talk) 14:50, 23 August 2021 (UTC)
 * ❌ - Zee business states it is ₹100 crore, whereas you have not included any references to support your figures - Arjayay (talk) 14:57, 23 August 2021 (UTC)

Semi-protected edit request on 24 August 2021
mamagam movie collocted 35cr ind rs only 2402:3A80:E2E:3597:D0ED:AA3F:CDCE:2DEE (talk) 15:46, 24 August 2021 (UTC)
 * ❌ - Zee business states it is ₹100 crore, whereas you have not included any references to support your figures - Arjayay (talk) 15:48, 24 August 2021 (UTC)

Fake collection report in reception
Did not cross 30cr mark and claiming to have 50cr and 100cr 116.68.98.68 (talk) 08:45, 8 January 2022 (UTC)