Talk:Mami Kawada/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Wugapodes (talk · contribs) 01:09, 29 January 2016 (UTC)

Will review. Wugapodes (talk) 01:09, 29 January 2016 (UTC)
 * Thanks. Currently working on the references (fixing redirects, and more importantly, adding archive links for dead links wherever possible). Narutolovehinata5 tccsdnew 01:26, 29 January 2016 (UTC)

Checklist
GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria 
 * 1) Is it reasonably well written?
 * A. Prose is "clear and concise", without copyvios, or spelling and grammar errors:
 * B. MoS compliance for lead, layout, words to watch, fiction, and lists:
 * 1) Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
 * A. Has an appropriate reference section:
 * B. Cites reliable sources, where necessary:
 * C. No original research:
 * All in japanese so WP:AGF on those
 * 1) Is it broad in its coverage?
 * A. Major aspects:
 * B. Focused (see summary style):
 * 1) Is it neutral?
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * 1) Is it stable?
 * No edit wars, etc:
 * 1) Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
 * A. Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid fair use rationales are provided for non-free content:
 * B. Images are provided if possible and are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions:
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass or Fail:
 * 1) Is it stable?
 * No edit wars, etc:
 * 1) Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
 * A. Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid fair use rationales are provided for non-free content:
 * B. Images are provided if possible and are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions:
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass or Fail:
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass or Fail:
 * Pass or Fail:

Comments
If the comment is numbered, it must be addressed for the article to pass, if it is bulleted, it's an optional suggestion or comment that you don't need to act on right now. When I quote things, you can use ctrl+f to search the page for the specific line I quoted.
 * 1) Do any sources happen to mention what year she was born?
 * 2) "Kawada announced her retirement from singing in May" You should include the year. Also, reword as I thought she announced that she retired in May, not that she will retire in May.
 * You should probably clean up the external links section as one of the templates you're using is being deleted.
 * Unfortunately, she keeps her age a secret. While various sources list her year of birth as either 1980 or 1978, neither have ever been confirmed by her, so adding a year of birth at this point would be a massive BLP violation (although outside of Wikipedia, I do use 1980 in casual speech). The original edit did include her year of retirement, but someone else removed the year. Will address the issues in a bit. Narutolovehinata5 tccsdnew 02:06, 29 January 2016 (UTC)
 * How is it a BLP violation? Since the information is WP:Verifiable, aren't we allowed to include it? (genuinely asking, I don't often write BLPs so I don't actually know) Wugapodes (talk) 02:09, 29 January 2016 (UTC)
 * None of the said sources (i.e. MyAnimeList) are reliable, as these tend to be user editable. The BLP policy states that contentious content (i.e. those likely to be challenged: in this case, a year of birth) must be cited to a reliable source, and no reliable sources have confirmed her age. This issue has been repeatedly raised in the article's peer reviews, but until the time comes that she reveals her age, as much as I would want to, I can't include it in the article. Narutolovehinata5 tccsdnew 02:16, 29 January 2016 (UTC)
 * That's a really good reason! You may want to add that as a footnote (if there's a source that says it) just so people know, but I'm not going to require that. Wugapodes (talk) 02:21, 29 January 2016 (UTC)
 * None of the said sources (i.e. MyAnimeList) are reliable, as these tend to be user editable. The BLP policy states that contentious content (i.e. those likely to be challenged: in this case, a year of birth) must be cited to a reliable source, and no reliable sources have confirmed her age. This issue has been repeatedly raised in the article's peer reviews, but until the time comes that she reveals her age, as much as I would want to, I can't include it in the article. Narutolovehinata5 tccsdnew 02:16, 29 January 2016 (UTC)
 * That's a really good reason! You may want to add that as a footnote (if there's a source that says it) just so people know, but I'm not going to require that. Wugapodes (talk) 02:21, 29 January 2016 (UTC)

Results
On hold for 7 days pending revisions. Very well done article! Just address those two comments and it's good to go! Wugapodes (talk) 01:46, 29 January 2016 (UTC) Listed Well written and came here with almost no problems. I wish more nominations were like this one! I hop to see more from you, so keep up the good work. Wugapodes (talk) 02:22, 29 January 2016 (UTC)