Talk:Mamilla Mall/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: GGT (talk · contribs) 22:20, 6 February 2015 (UTC)

I have read the article and found the read truly enjoyable, congratulations on your beautiful work here! Regarding a few very minor concerns that I have, I will make a few bold changes to proceed with the review. --GGT (talk) 22:20, 6 February 2015 (UTC)


 * Location, history and retail sections: All in compliance with WP:WIAGA.
 * Exhibitions and events: Was concerned with the use of blogs here, but the same content is verified by other reliable sources, which I would say is enough alone.
 * Attempted terror attack: In compliance with WP:WIAGA. I would suggest this section to be incorporated into the history section, but I can imagine the rationale with its separation, as the history section is more concerned with the development of the mall/its site.

--GGT (talk) 22:40, 6 February 2015 (UTC)

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria


 * 1) Is it reasonably well written?
 * A. Prose is "clear and concise", without copyvios, or spelling and grammar errors:
 * B. MoS compliance for lead, layout, words to watch, fiction, and lists:
 * 1) Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
 * A. Has an appropriate reference section:
 * B. Citations to reliable sources:
 * C. No original research:
 * 1) Is it broad in its coverage?
 * A. Major aspects:
 * B. Focused:
 * 1) Is it neutral?
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * 1) Is it stable?
 * No edit wars, etc:
 * 1) Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
 * A. Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid fair use rationales are provided for non-free content:
 * B. Images are provided if possible and are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions:
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass or Fail:
 * 1) Is it stable?
 * No edit wars, etc:
 * 1) Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
 * A. Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid fair use rationales are provided for non-free content:
 * B. Images are provided if possible and are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions:
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass or Fail:
 * B. Images are provided if possible and are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions:
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass or Fail:
 * Pass or Fail:

This nomination has passed, congratulations! A very thorough, fine and interesting piece of work, with extensive illustration of the article. Thank you for the enjoyable read --GGT (talk) 22:45, 6 February 2015 (UTC)
 * Thank you! Yoninah (talk) 17:33, 7 February 2015 (UTC)