Talk:Man, Economy, and State

No info as to the importance of the work?
This might sound like an immature comment, but here it goes. For being such a seminal work, that introduction sucks. If I ever get a chance, I'll see if I can improve it. If not, this would be something to consider adding to as a note to anybody who's interested.  Lighthead  þ 00:03, 4 November 2016 (UTC)

Not original research
It is not original research to write a summary that merely describes a book's contents in shorter length, without attempting a literary analysis or anything like that. I believe WP:USEPRIMARY is on my side when it gives the example of a novel. It would be hard for an encyclopedia to cover books if they could not be described like I did, and there is no indication in the rules about original research that forbidding this was anything like the intent. Thiagovscoelho (talk) 00:50, 25 February 2023 (UTC)


 * Did an AI write the summary? Llll5032 (talk) 23:13, 18 December 2023 (UTC)

Merger proposal
I think Power and Market should be merged here, since most references to it have been to the edition that publishes it together with Man, Economy and State, and as such, it is hard to find sources specifically about P&M rather than to both books as a unit. Thiagovscoelho (talk) 16:06, 30 May 2023 (UTC)
 * ✅ Klbrain (talk) 21:16, 18 December 2023 (UTC)