Talk:Man track controversy

To do

 * sources
 * other similar claims

Something doesn't make sense
The intro paragraph reads:


 * The man track controversy...refers to the alleged discovery of million year-old human footprints...These claims are strongly believed by strict-young earth creationists...

I know that creationists' ideas are based on faith, not logic and reason, but even so, this seems too illogical to me. Young-earth creationists believe the Earth is only some ten millenia old at most&mdash;anything on Earth dated at a million years would instantly disprove YEC in its current form (which of course is why even so few creationists are YECs). Perhaps it is the garden-variety creationists who strongly believe in the purported age and identity of these tracks? &mdash; Knowledge Seeker &#2470; 02:21, 5 January 2006 (UTC)


 * Good catch. It doesn't make sense. I've fixed it now, but some copy-edit is still needed. See my last edit for the changes made. Gflores Talk 02:51, 5 January 2006 (UTC)