Talk:Manchester/to do


 * 1) The first, third and forth paragraphs of the "Music and theatre" section are unsourced.
 * 2) The "Literature" section needs some tidying up and expansion. Engels wasn't writing a novel, and it's not at all clear in what way Dickens was influenced by Gaskell. Generally seems a bit lightweight.
 * 3) In Landmarks, "...although recently there has been an upsurge in interest for building more." and "...is an example of the new surge..." - what does that mean? It isn't backed up in any references. So they built a highrise, doesn't seem to be abnormal there. per Peer review/Manchester.
 * 4) The "Literature" section requires a citation template for two sources.
 * 5) The "Nightlife" section is almost entirely unsourced.
 * 6) Several instances of weasel words "it has been", "it is claimed" etc should be looked at, per Peer review/Manchester.
 * 7) The "Landmarks" section seems seriously short of references, and there's a large paragraph about Old Trafford, which isn't even in Manchester.
 * 8) The bulk of the middle section of the "Media" section is unsourced.
 * 9) The "Transport" section is almost entirely unsourced.
 * 10) The first paragraph of the "Sports" section is entirely unsourced.
 * 11) The "Twin cities and consulates" is entirely unsourced.
 * 12) The World war II section starts off by saying that Manchester was a centre of/was involved in heavy industrial construction. But this isn't mentioned in the Industrial Revolution section, from which a reader would suppose that all Manchester made was textiles.
 * 13) Check the figures in the Demographic section for Manchester City the percentage of people of Asian background is 9.1% and the number of people who belong to the Muslim faith also equals 9.1%, however there is also a category for Hindu's which is 0.7%, surely some, if not all those classified as Hindu should be included in the figure for people from an Asian background.