Talk:Manga Force: The Ultimate Collection

References problem
There is no reference/proof to support that this information has come it's source (the publishers). Also information is innaccurate as no such appology was been made in the issue 12, and no such letter was released to subscribers for the error --Insanityinc 13:59, 26 May 2007 (UTC)
 * Moreover, the issue 10 that I bought here in Malta (where the last issue to come out is 19 or 20) came with a large sticker on the celophane, informing about the mistake and saying that it would be corrected with issue 12. All in all, the whole section about the Street Fighter Alpha error is rather unnecessary, or at the very least too long. --SeverityOne (talk) 18:00, 18 December 2007 (UTC)
 * I disagree that the section is unnecessary. For a magazine of this type to make such a large error is not very common, and is of note. Perhaps the length is too much though. I still have the letter explination of the error, but I'm unsure of the Wiki policy of scanning or if it would be acceptable to scan the letter and use that instead of the typing.--Insanityinc (talk) 23:07, 22 December 2007 (UTC)
 * Well, my point is really that the length of this section is disproportional compared to the length of the entire article. It also sounds almost offended at the grave error; that is the general feeling of the section. Also, it sounds like you received that letter yourself, which would make this original research. After all, there are no references. As for the contents of that letter, that would probably constiture as a breach of copyright, since you're quoting the entire letter. But I'm not an expert on these issues. SeverityOne (talk) 20:30, 10 March 2008 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:Mangaforce1.JPG
Image:Mangaforce1.JPG is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot 10:17, 1 October 2007 (UTC)

- Di-disputed fair use rationale issue fixed with a non-template explination. I believe this will solve the issue unless there is a mistake that I have made. --Insanityinc 19:33, 1 October 2007 (UTC)

Updates

Updates
Added the Last 4 or 5 titles on the liste enjoy quoted directly from the hachet customer care hotline. Mad man8207 (talk) 19:51, 22 July 2008 (UTC)

Number of Issues
I changed the line to detail the number of issues. I emailed the publisher and they responded by telling me that there were to be 71 issues. I still have the email in my inbox.Ravengambit (talk) 21:15, 10 October 2008 (UTC)
 * The problem is you received that e-mail yourself, which would make it original research. After all, there are no references. I don't think that kind of source is allowed as proof anyway for the same reasons as stated above in References Problem. Insanityinc (talk) 18:43, 11 October 2008 (UTC)
 * "Original research" is perhaps a bit too ambitious a phrase for receiving an e-mail. With "research", I'm more thinking of examining creatures under a microscope, sort of thing. On the other hand, the web site is suspiciously void of any information about number of issues, and these things always (now that is original research, or at least personal observation :) ) get extended and expanded until everybody gets fed up pouring money into a neverending series of whatever. SeverityOne (talk) 19:06, 1 April 2009 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Manga Force: The Ultimate Collection. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070206073000/http://www.hachettepartworks.co.uk/product.php?proID=1166798494 to http://www.hachettepartworks.co.uk/product.php?proID=1166798494
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110129175429/http://www.creative-plus.co.uk/newspage.html to http://www.creative-plus.co.uk/newspage.html
 * Added tag to http://www.manga.com/products/psychic_wars
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090314000415/http://www.hachettepartworks.com/product.php?proID=1166798494 to http://www.hachettepartworks.com/product.php?proID=1166798494

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 05:51, 15 January 2018 (UTC)