Talk:Manuel Rivera-Ortiz/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Kinglear (talk) 14:36, 8 August 2010 (UTC) This article is well written, concise, and well-footnoted with reliable third-party sources. The article is accompanied by appropriate graphics and images and the layout is clean and attractive.

Additional comments The article should not be promoted in the current form. Hekerui (talk) 14:48, 8 August 2010 (UTC)
 * The images lack proper evidence of permission. Hekerui (talk) 15:01, 8 August 2010 (UTC)
 * I don't think the article has not enough content to make the treatment "broad", the quotes are excessive and more than the descriptive text (besides, Wikiquote is for rows of quotations), and even at the short length the lead doesn't summarize the article properly.
 * The section sorting is not correct per WP:LAYOUT.
 * Several references need page numbers.

I like the article and support the nomination. I particularly like the fact that the photographer is non-Caucasian. Fotografenauge (talk) 16:36, 8 August 2010 (UTC)

Great article and excellent nomination! TheRightEye (talk) 17:03, 8 August 2010 (UTC)

Pass
The article is well written, is factually accurate and verfifiable and broad. SwissLawyer (talk) 22:15, 8 August 2010 (UTC)

I will boldy close this as fail - it lacks broad coverage and the copyright status for several images is unclear. Hekerui (talk) 18:53, 15 August 2010 (UTC)