Talk:Manuela Carmena

Coment
A user has being adding biased non-notable stuff into this small article, pulling dog-whistle after dog-whistle to counter a perceived spin in the article (I concede the debt stuff was woefully (and misleadedly) phrased and can be dropped out under that conditions, though). Pretty darn impressive pulling such stuff out of the hat given the huge amount of municipal policies out there that are both notable and "controversial".--Asqueladd (talk) 11:37, 3 March 2017 (UTC)

How is it biased to add content from El Pais, a newspaper of record? If the Melilla stuff was gossip, why did their mayor respond? Funny we can have a whole article on Wikipedia about Donald Trump trying to run Sweden and rightly getting his arse kicked for it, but the mayor of Madrid making similarly out of scope comments about Melilla must be buried alive. Valentina Cardoso (talk) 17:09, 3 March 2017 (UTC)
 * Yeah, it's a conspiracy... WHATABOUTISM at its finest. Anyways, why don't you start adding content about the city policies, which IIRC include plenty of the "controversy" juice you seem to yearn for (urbanization halts, contested measures towards enforcing the so called "historic memory", anti-pollution measures, low-participation consultations, et al.) instead of comparing mr. Trump to this missus for the sake of validating your bias.--Asqueladd (talk) 18:37, 3 March 2017 (UTC)