Talk:Manufacturing bill of materials

Difference from EBOM
What distinguishes an MBOM from an EBOM? I only see hand-waving language here that such a difference exists. 70.251.33.92 (talk) 19:05, 2 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Bill of materials has some information on the difference. Probably some scientific sources will provide more insight, but the two are definitely not the same. Van der Hoorn (talk) 15:02, 3 January 2009 (UTC)


 * Honestly, I can't get past the first paragraph(s) there either. What I want/need to know is the following:


 * Given an assembly A, containing one each of part B and part C, how would the EBOM differ from the MBOM? Does the MBOM not show assembly A, also containing part B and C?


 * This is the crux of the issue. If it does, I don't see any difference.  That is, the difference seems to be procedural ("as designed" versus "as built"), not organizational.  If there is an organizational difference, what is it?  What is is the *value* in having a difference?  That is, why doesn't manufacturing just use the EBOM?


 * I'm playing devil's advocate here. I know there's a difference, but I can't divine what it is from this article (or business types in general)...  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.251.0.185 (talk) 22:24, 3 January 2009 (UTC)

WBS
How does the MBOM relate to the Work breakdown structure? 70.247.170.9 (talk) 22:23, 18 January 2009 (UTC)