Talk:Marasmius rotula/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Rcej (Robert) - talk 02:17, 8 January 2010 (UTC)

Interesting; this looks rather like a flower from first glance. First little fix right now, as I'm not seeing many to fix, is the closing lead sentence: "Unlike most other mushrooms, M. rotula releases its spores in response to rain, rather than being controlled by a circadian rhythm." Might need a little context for non-bio folks, like adding a '...which yada yada.'-- Rcej (Robert) - talk 02:17, 8 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Made these changes - better now? Sasata (talk) 05:12, 8 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Very nice, young man.-- Rcej (Robert) - talk 06:10, 8 January 2010 (UTC)

Results of review

 * GA review (see here for criteria)

The article Marasmius rotula passes this review, and has been upgraded to good article status. The article is found by the reviewing editor to be deserving of good article status based on the following criteria:
 * 1) It is reasonably well written.
 * a (prose): b (MoS):
 * 1) It is factually accurate and verifiable.
 * a (references): b (citations to reliable sources):  c (OR):
 * 1) It is broad in its coverage.
 * a (major aspects): b (focused):
 * 1) It follows the neutral point of view policy.
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * 1) It is stable.
 * No edit wars, etc.:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail: