Talk:Marasmius sasicola/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Rcej (Robert) - talk 03:25, 20 January 2011 (UTC)

The article doesn't need a lot of fixin'... just a couple things:
 * Mycomorphbox us! (betcha didn't know 'mycomorphbox' can be used as a verb...heh)
 * Added one. J Milburn (talk) 15:56, 20 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Edibility status? Rcej (Robert) - talk 07:56, 20 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Not specified. Unlikely to be edible, and would be of no use/interest anyway. J Milburn (talk) 15:56, 20 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Very good! Rcej (Robert) - talk 09:47, 21 January 2011 (UTC)

Results of review

 * GA review (see here for criteria)

The article Marasmius sasicola passes this review, and has been promoted to good article status. The article is found by the reviewing editor to be deserving of good article status based on the following criteria:
 * 1) It is reasonably well written.
 * a (prose): b (MoS):
 * 1) It is factually accurate and verifiable.
 * a (references): b (citations to reliable sources):  c (OR):
 * 1) It is broad in its coverage.
 * a (major aspects): b (focused):
 * 1) It follows the neutral point of view policy.
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * 1) It is stable.
 * No edit wars, etc.:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail: