Talk:Marc Pugh/GA1

GA Reassessment
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the reassessment.''

This article has been reviewed as part of WikiProject Good articles/Project quality task force in an effort to ensure all listed Good articles continue to meet the Good article criteria. In reviewing the article, I have found there are a number of issues that need to be addressed.
 * It is reasonably well written.
 * a (prose): b (MoS):
 * The prose is average, maybe a 6/10.
 * The lead is too short and does not adequately sum up the article.


 * It is factually accurate and verifiable.
 * a (references): b (citations to reliable sources):  c (OR):
 * It is broad in its coverage.
 * a (major aspects): b (focused):
 * This article is in urgent need of updating to cover the most recent seasons and this Welsh issue.
 * His early life and personal life are ignored by the article and must be included.

I will check back in no less than seven days. If progress is being made, the article will remain listed as a Good article. Otherwise, it may be delisted (such a decision may be challenged through WP:GAR). If improved after it has been delisted, it may be nominated at WP:GAN again. Feel free to drop a message on my talk page if you have any questions, and many thanks for all the hard work that has gone into this article thus far. Regards--Jackyd101 (talk) 19:22, 16 December 2008 (UTC)
 * It follows the neutral point of view policy.
 * a (fair representation): b (all significant views):
 * It is stable.
 * It contains images, where possible, to illustrate the topic.
 * a (tagged and captioned): b (lack of images does not in itself exclude GA):  c (non-free images have fair use rationales):
 * Overall:
 * a Pass/Fail:
 * a Pass/Fail:
 * I was asked to look at the article again, and the prose, lead and updating has all been satifactoarily improved, good job. Although this will almost certainly pass now, I would like to see some information about his life outside football: is he married, has he been in the news for any reason and any other information which may be relevant (See Brian Urlacher for a good example of how such a section may look, although I don't expect one for this article to be as long). Well done on the hard work.--Jackyd101 (talk) 16:57, 18 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Actually, on second thoughts, although what I said above is valid and should be explored, I am going to pass this now. Well done.--Jackyd101 (talk) 16:59, 18 December 2008 (UTC)