Talk:Marchywka effect

Evaluation
I saw your request through Electroporation and have done what I can to clean up the article while reviewing it. I fear this article suffers from problems common in issues of Conflicts of interest. But since there do appear to be third party references to back up the notability of the concept, so it is not entirely out of the question that an article could exist for this.

"private communication I talk to myself" is not a valid source. This would be considered WP:Original Research, which is not appropriate for Wikipedia.

I'm no lawyer, but as I understand it, with most contries, in modern law, "abandonned property" is not simply by it's nature in the public domain, copyrights are assumed to be in effect for all creative works unless explicitly entered into public domain by the author.

pictures/diagrams are not currently included in the article. It looks as though they are intended to be. To include an image within an article, it must first be uploaded to the wiki.

You may wish to look into beneficial templates like Template:Cite book for your references. They can do a lot to increase organization and standardization of your references, and also make the straight wiki markup for the article easier to read through.

I'm no expect on the subject; as a hobbyist, I only recently got into evaporative deposition (which granted is more than most WP editors will be familiar with), so I generally stayed away from examining any of the actual facts in the article. However, at first glance, I can say that I wouldn't be surprised if there were one or more existing articles on WP that close to, but not quite, on this topic (the thin film/deposition articles are in a bit of a disorganized state at the moment in terms of article scope). If a good appropriate overlying concept article can be found, it may be a good idea to instead start by adding a section to the existing article describing this phenomena.

Let me know if I can be of any further assistance. Happy editing! -Verdatum (talk) 19:19, 5 January 2009 (UTC)

thanks, I'll take a look at those
Yes, many of the things you cite are placeholders as I won't site talking to myself or original research or ideas. Formatting is certainly a ways off but it hadn't occured to me to expand with wiki links to simple things like normal electrochemistry as I'd imagine they exist as you point out. I've also contacted some people who work in this specific area for their comments.

Also, regarding images, I first tried to upload to wiki but apparently I'm not authorized. I'm checking on status but in any case am hoping to get authorized use of published or public domain images. These were photos I literally had in my closet LOL and while I happen to have been able to host them on an independent site, they don't really "verify" anything as the chain of evidence ( so to speak ) is non existent ( I'm not sure they even represent what I claim ).

Nerdseeksblonde (talk) 20:46, 5 January 2009 (UTC)

mechanical edits
I've always seen a reference used as a noun, depending on a variety of factors. Since I was trying to cut out extra junk, I thought using "[]" as a noun was clearer but inserting the work name or author into the text is fine. Nerdseeksblonde (talk) 18:38, 20 June 2009 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 1 one external link on Marchywka effect. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/20090612084359/http://www.drexel.edu:80/coas/chemistry/Faculty%20PDFs/2008-09%20Faculty%20Publications%20List.pdf to http://www.drexel.edu/coas/chemistry/Faculty%20PDFs/2008-09%20Faculty%20Publications%20List.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

Cheers.—cyberbot II  Talk to my owner :Online 10:59, 24 February 2016 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 one external links on Marchywka effect. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20100215201403/http://www.spottext.com:80/marchywka/Appl.Phys.Lett.67.3414.1995.pdf to http://www.spottext.com/marchywka/Appl.Phys.Lett.67.3414.1995.pdf
 * Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20080720115625/http://www.qcaustralia.org/Publications/2006/Greentree_Olivero_et%20al.pdf to http://www.qcaustralia.org/Publications/2006/Greentree_Olivero_et%20al.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).

Cheers.—cyberbot II  Talk to my owner :Online 16:44, 3 May 2016 (UTC)