Talk:Marci Zaroff

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Marci Zaroff. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20151003053520/http://agln.aspeninstitute.org/fellows/marci-zaroff to http://agln.aspeninstitute.org/fellows/marci-zaroff
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20150916192332/http://2015ngoconference.org/index.html to http://www.2015ngoconference.org/index.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 14:15, 16 January 2018 (UTC)

PROD
I do find coverage in reliable sources, but the article would need a lot of editing to remove the promotional aspects and add facts. RebeccaGreen (talk) 01:44, 31 December 2018 (UTC)
 * Interesting, what coverage? There is one quote in WSJ which is negligible. There is also a Forbes blog with a very very brief name drop, but I think that does not qualify as RS because it is a blog. Utsill (talk) 20:42, 2 January 2019 (UTC)
 * Here is some of the coverage: 'Blazing a trail for organic cotton farming', The Hindu (October 23, 2018) ; there is a section on her in the book Eco Amazons : 20 women who are transforming the world (Brooklyn, NY : PowerHouse Books, 2011, ISBN 9781576875711); and there is a bit in 'Organic Clothes Not Just for Hippies Now', The Washington Post (February 10, 2007) . Several other articles have a sentence or para about her or one of her firms. I haven't seen the book, so I can't say how much it has about her, rather than by her. (There are some interviews as well, but obviously not considered RS.) RebeccaGreen (talk) 05:35, 3 January 2019 (UTC)
 * I have added the references from The Hindu and The Washington Post. There are 3 independent sources now, I would say (those and the WSJ), and with the profile in the book, they might add up to enough. It would probably need someone with access to the book to rewrite the article, though. RebeccaGreen (talk) 02:54, 6 January 2019 (UTC)