Talk:Marcos Mantis

November 2021
Regarding the multiple issues template I’ve added, note the following: MxWondrous (talk) 06:04, 3 November 2021 (UTC)
 * 1) The article goes way too much into the technical details while paying little attention to the model or its history and types and development, market reception, sales, etc. and looks like a sales pamphlet.
 * 2) Unlike how an article should be, this article might end up confusing readers due to the intricate details and also because of the image entitled “Marcos Mantis (1968 model)”, whereas the image description page mentions the title as “1971 Marcos Mantis” where this year is different from the year of taking the photograph, which is 1972.
 * 3) The encyclopaedic style does not include writing just tech details and numbers in prose, that too, in a poorly formatted manner.