Talk:Marcus Allen/GA1

GA Reassessment
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the reassessment.''

Article only has 7 references, is barely even a c class article. How it got to be a good article status is beyond me. i don't think the reviewer knew what they were doing. - -The Spooky One (talk to me) 21:41, 1 November 2008 (UTC)
 * I agree, but since there is no response, you should go ahead and delete this. (FYI, its likely this was reviewed when the criteria was much less strict. Also the problem isn't simply the number of references its that way in which they are used, plus there is a whole raft of other problems.)--Jackyd101 (talk) 10:50, 20 November 2008 (UTC)
 * I see the above user has been banned for sockpuppeting (or something). As he is not around to close this, I will.--Jackyd101 (talk) 23:28, 6 December 2008 (UTC)