Talk:Marcus Haber/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: EBY3221 (talk · contribs) 01:20, 9 June 2013 (UTC)

Review
 :

:

:

.

. :



Discussion
Fix the holds and article passes - though would like to see links to football terms, or in-narrative description on first use (something as simple as "friendly game" clarifies things.) Otherwise, really good job. EBY (talk) 18:44, 9 June 2013 (UTC)
 * If no one else does this by the middle of today, I'll take a stab at it. Luke no 94  (tell Luke off here) 07:16, 13 June 2013 (UTC)

Not sure of the nominator was aware the review had begun/was on hold, so I've just notified them. cheers, Struway2 (talk) 12:34, 13 June 2013 (UTC)
 * A little bit redundant, now, Struway: I've completed the tasks I saw above. I should note that Haber has not been released by Stevenage, he has been transfer-listed - and that information was already in the article. Luke no 94  (tell Luke off here) 12:39, 13 June 2013 (UTC)
 * You may not be aware that WP:GAN/I requires the reviewer to notify the nominator when they put the review on hold. I imagine the reviewer forgot, so I did it for them. cheers, Struway2 (talk) 12:45, 13 June 2013 (UTC)
 * Firstly, cheers EBY for reviewing the article. I see Lukeno94 has already made the neccessary changes (thanks), although I have just made a couple of other very small changes. And thank you Struway for the heads up, I hadn't noticed it had been placed on hold, so much appreciated for letting me know. Cheers. SBFCEdit (talk) 14:31, 13 June 2013 (UTC)
 * I didn't realize that it was a requirement, Struway, but I was being light-hearted anyway. :) Luke no 94  (tell Luke off here) 13:48, 13 June 2013 (UTC)
 * It's NOT a requirement, Struway, though I appreciate you passing the word (though not the BITEy-ness). Thanks, Luke +, for all the good edits. The release was premature - it's a possible transfer? Ah. In any event, yes - the article passes criteria. EBY (talk) 17:22, 13 June 2013 (UTC)