Talk:Marcus Rashford/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Kpddg (talk · contribs) 10:27, 6 January 2022 (UTC)

Hello ArsenalGhanaPartey. I will be reviewing this article over the coming days. Please let me know for any problems. Thank You. Kpddg  (talk)  10:27, 6 January 2022 (UTC)

Lead Section

 * Good; very well-written

Early Life

 * Fine; backed by sources

Club Career
Early Career


 * 'Fletcher Ross Rangers academy development officer Dave Horrocks recalls that Rashford was on a "different level" to (replace with 'as compared') other boys, playing a major role as the team won a tournament with 15 scouts from various clubs watching'
 * 'Former United youth coach Paul McGuinness quickly saw Rashford's potential due to his athleticism both on and off the ball....' What does 'on and off the ball' mean? Replace 'ball' with field.
 * What does 'cage football' mean? Make it clear.

2015–16 season: Debut
 * Fine

2016–17 season: European success


 * Why have words like 'tremendous fashion' been used? Clear violation of | WP: PEACOCK
 * 'As a player however he failed to score until 7 January 2017 when he scored a four-minute brace in the FA Cup against Jaap Stam's Reading, which ended 4–0' Where did he not score? Add commas here.

2018–19 season
 * Again, words like 'devastating' player are not neutral
 * These sections contain too much content, much of which will appeal only to a particular audience
 * No need to describe every action of his, like his penalty as 'fearless'. Just mentioning it is enough here on Wikipedia.

Too Many 'Flattery' Words
I've stopped the review mid-way and went though the whole article. I found many instances of such usage, which goes against the neutral point of view. Improving this will take some time. Hence, I recommend that these issues be resolved. Once done, the article can be re-nominated. Kpddg  (talk)  13:49, 6 January 2022 (UTC)

This article fails