Talk:Marcy Wheeler

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 5 external links on Marcy Wheeler. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070503121010/http://www.anatomyofdeceit.com/prologue to http://www.anatomyofdeceit.com/prologue
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070411232129/http://www.democracynow.org/article.pl?sid=07%2F03%2F07%2F1436232 to http://www.democracynow.org/article.pl?sid=07%2F03%2F07%2F1436232
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070315123307/http://www.yearlykosconvention.org/nycparty07 to http://www.yearlykosconvention.org/nycparty07
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090515105025/http://www.hillmanfoundation.org/pages/honorees/2009.html to http://www.hillmanfoundation.org/pages/honorees/2009.html
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070503121010/http://www.anatomyofdeceit.com/prologue to http://www.anatomyofdeceit.com/prologue

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 03:07, 2 June 2017 (UTC)

Disputed
The recent edit about the Muller report seems like a personal opinion, consideing it doesn't have a cited source. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Kaisacascade (talk • contribs) 13:27, 17 February 2022 (UTC)


 * The recent edit is on the mark since she made many claims that turned out to be at best unprovable ant worst completely wrong. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2601:182:4202:6C20:44CE:C0BF:F68:789A (talk) 13:30, 17 February 2022 (UTC)


 * Your edits were correctly deleted for three reasons:
 * You must cite reliable sources.
 * Don't insert your own opinions (" Wheeler opines on the law, but has no legal training.").
 * What you wrote is false and a common misunderstanding perpetuated by Russian media, Fox News, right-wing media, and Trump. ("The Mueller investigation found there was no collusion between the Trump campaign and Russia thereby refuting much of her reporting.")
 * Mueller was unable to prove "conspiracy" and "coordination", but found myriad forms of collusion. This collusion is usually described with various other words. In fact, Trump and his campaign invited, welcomed, defended, cooperated with, aided, abetted, and facilitated the proven Russian interference in the election designed to put him in power. He also revealed classified information to the Russians, sometimes exposing friendly sources and endangering their lives. Even Giuliani admitted the campaign colluded with the Russians. Trump also obstructed the investigations and destroyed and withheld evidence. He has a habit of ripping up official documents, which is illegal. He even flushed them. His campaign had myriad illicit and secret contacts with literal Russian secret agents.
 * More information, with the RS which document it, is found here:
 * Mueller report
 * Mueller report
 * Links between Trump associates and Russian officials
 * Donald Trump's disclosures of classified information
 * The earliest evidence of collusion I have found was this tweet from an influential Russian he met at the 2013 Miss Universe contest. Alferova's Jan 22, 2014 tweet is significant evidence that he had been talking with Russians about his plans before the American public knew of them: "Apparently she knew Trump was going to run for president a year and a half before he made his formal announcement." This has been cited as evidence of collusion. -- Valjean (talk) 15:28, 17 February 2022 (UTC)