Talk:Margaret Preston

Rewrite
There is a lot of good information here, but the style is horrible. It needs to be wikified, with internal links, references, section headers... And it has a bunch of possibly non-notable, sentimental information that doesn't seem very encyclopedic. Logical Gentleman (talk) 02:50, 29 August 2009 (UTC)
 * The main issue appears to be that an outside website was ported into Wikipedia wholesale and with no citations on 9 August 2009, a blatant copyright violation. (Or just possibly the very long 9 August edit was later ported outwards, but it doesn't look like it because the outside website is sourced and appears to date to February 2009.) Anyway, I have worked on cleaning up the article as I agree with your general take on this. It could still use a larger number of sources, however, as right now there are really just two.Alafarge (talk) 23:38, 1 January 2016 (UTC)