Talk:Margaret Sinclair (nun)

Why?
There appears to be nothing at all notable or remarkable about the life of the subject of this article, unless it has somehow been omitted. Apparently the only matter of note is having been declared "venerable" some decades after her death but there is no indication as to why this was done. The implication, if there is one, is that she was singled out for her ordinariness but surely there are numerous such unremarkable nuns. Can anyone shed light? Mutt Lunker (talk) 23:08, 23 August 2016 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Margaret Sinclair (nun). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added tag to http://www.stpatricksparish.co.uk/sinclair.htm
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20061024212135/http://www.indcatholicnews.com/nsct.html to http://www.indcatholicnews.com/nsct.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 06:23, 2 June 2017 (UTC)

Weird
NoelveNoelve, what's the problem? I've primarily added sourced information on the beatification – the church always begins with the process of beatification – process of Margaret Sinclair and put a parameter of the infobox to its usual place. Furthermore, I added a reliable source and removed the misleading information that someone whose beatification process is still open is venerated in the Roman Catholic Church. (You even reset the edited caption, which only and explicitedly refers to Venerable Mary Francis of the Five Wounds.) If this will lead you to go "to conflict resolution", don't bother, I shall remove the article from my watch list, I just wonder what your behaviour supposed to mean. Medusahead (talk) 10:37, 2 July 2024 (UTC)