Talk:Margery Wolf

Suggestions
I have some suggestions that the GA nominator may want to address before the entry gets picked up for a GA review. Hopefully this helps. Larry Hockett (Talk) 21:59, 7 May 2021 (UTC)
 * The lead section is too short to adequately summarize the information in the body of the article. The section on Wolf's works takes up a big chunk of the body of the article, but those works are not specifically mentioned in the lead.
 * The Biography section names Wolf's most well-known work, but it only gets a couple of sentences of coverage, and it isn't even mentioned in the section covering her notable works.
 * It seems like there are big gaps in her career timeline. She is described as a fellow at Stanford/CASBS in the mid-50s, goes to Taiwan, returns to New York, then is mentioned at Stanford again in a section that otherwise covers the 1980s. Did she return to Stanford in the 1980s, or is this mention just out of place? With a little bit clearer timeline, I think this entry will be easier to follow and a good bit closer to meeting the GA criteria.

Copyright problem removed
Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from: https://www.degruyter.com/document/isbn/9780804765619/html https://www.sup.org/books/title/?id=3233 https://www.legacy.com/amp/obituaries/pressdemocrat/185179426. Copied or closely paraphrased material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.)

For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, and, if allowed under fair use, may copy sentences and phrases, provided they are included in quotation marks and referenced properly. The material may also be rewritten, providing it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Therefore, such paraphrased portions must provide their source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you. ƒirefly ( t · c ) 09:52, 21 May 2021 (UTC)