Talk:Maria Jacobsen

Close paraphrasing
I tagged the article for close paraphrasing per the DYK discussion because, though much of the close paraphrasing has been corrected, I'm not sure as to whether the copyrighted text still in the article's history needs to be scrubbed. czar  &middot;   &middot;  22:21, 20 July 2013 (UTC)
 * Copyright_problems says it can remain in the page history once corrected, so I'm removing the tag. czar   &middot;   &middot;  22:29, 20 July 2013 (UTC)

Copyright problem removed
Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from: http://www.fredsakademiet.dk/library/karekin/ukmaria.htm. Copied or closely paraphrased material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you. czar  &middot;   &middot;  22:29, 20 July 2013 (UTC)


 * This is unbelievable. You haven't given me one example or sentence that has been fully copied and pasted from any source. SHOW ME where the violations are instead of pointing to a couple of words here and there that can be found in both the article and the source. Proudbolsahye (talk) 22:37, 20 July 2013 (UTC)
 * This template was just a notice to acknowledge that it's been mostly fixed, since we're not fishing the copyvios out of the page revision history. There isn't much left to discuss. You can view your edits that undid what the detector found to be vios here. Those passages and the others mentioned at the DYK nom can be compared with the Karekin source. As the reviewer, it became my responsibility to investigate, but it's nearly over now. I don't want to draw this out—let's just fix it and make sure it doesn't happen again in the future. czar   &middot;   &middot;  22:49, 20 July 2013 (UTC)