Talk:Marian Dora

Citations Need Work
The citations in this article are formatted all inside one footnote. Each source should be separated as its own footnote. Also, the section headings are footnoted, not individual claims, making it impossible to know which statements are verified by which sources. Needs some cleanup. — Henry chianski (talk) 18:17, 24 November 2017 (UTC)
 * I moved the references from the headers to the text like you asked. Basically, I combined the sources as most of them relate to most issues. Now, can we please archive this?--79.182.133.116 (talk) 18:57, 24 November 2017 (UTC)
 * No we cannot archive this. It's been about four seconds, calm down.  Please read up on standard Wiki footnoting formatting.  There needs to be a footnote per source, not one footnote with a dozen sources crammed in.  It should be easier, not harder, for readers to see what source each claim came from. — Henry chianski (talk) 19:01, 24 November 2017 (UTC)
 * Feel free to do so yourself after kindly reading some linked sources and matching each to each claim. Afterwards, after the issue has been delt with to your satisfaction, please archive this as I find those trivial bickerings uglifying of my work. Thank you and same goes for Shira and MdE. From WP:PRIMARYCARE: “The novel itself is an acceptable primary source for information about the plot, the names of the characters, the number of chapters, or other contents in the book [...] The film itself is an acceptable primary source for information about the plot and the names of the characters.” I doubt sources are even required for the synopsis.--79.182.133.116 (talk) 19:06, 24 November 2017 (UTC)