Talk:Marie Thérèse Louise of Savoy/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Luxtaythe2nd (talk · contribs) 15:58, 17 January 2023 (UTC)

Seems good and well-sourced at first glance. Let the review begin! Luxtay the IInd (talketh to me) 15:58, 17 January 2023 (UTC)

This article fails the first two criteria&mdash;it fails 1a with inconsistent spelling, incredibly long paragraphs without any breaks, and the dialogue in the Death section being rather confusing. It fails 1b immediately as well; the templates at the article's beginning are sorted in violation of MOS:LEAD. Luxtay the IInd (talketh to me) 16:11, 17 January 2023 (UTC) The sources in these articles are generally good, but the article automatically fails 2b because of the final statement in the Marriage section being unreferenced. Also, this isn't a rule, but the article also cites Hardy's 1908 work on her almost everywhere. Luxtay the IInd (talketh to me) 16:20, 17 January 2023 (UTC) The article is often rambly, although it covers the important aspects of her life well. Not much else to comment on. Luxtay the IInd (talketh to me) 16:30, 17 January 2023 (UTC) The images are very well-done and high quality and none of them violates any copyright laws; the article is subject to active editing, but not edit-warring; sadly, it has some bias in the later sections against the revolutionaries so it doesn't pass criteria 4. Luxtay the IInd (talketh to me) 16:38, 17 January 2023 (UTC)
 * a.
 * b.
 * b.
 * a.
 * b.
 * c.
 * d.
 * d.
 * a.
 * a.
 * a.
 * a.
 * a.

The number hashes look weird now. Anyway, thank you for nominating this article. Sadly, it did not pass, and I invite you to fix the issues described in the review. Luxtay the IInd (talketh to me) 16:44, 17 January 2023 (UTC)

Additionally, this could be considered a quickfail because of violations of the neutral point of view policy (see quickfail rule 3). Statements such as "it was a frequent slander that the two had been lovers" and puffery like "enormous", "mocked", and "propaganda" disqualify this in my opinion. Luxtay the IInd (talketh to me) 18:25, 17 January 2023 (UTC)