Talk:Marija Bursać/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Peacemaker67 (talk · contribs) 13:26, 14 June 2015 (UTC)

Re 1a: The Serbo-Croatian name of the organisation was always Savez komunističke omladine Jugoslavije, the correct translation of which is "League of Communist Youth of Yugoslavia", and not at all "Young Communist League of Yugoslavia". I see that the article on SKOJ starts with that name, but it's someone's mistake. I'll make changes per your other suggestions.

Re 6a:
 * The 1967 book was published in Yugoslavia and it explains how and when the photo was made. It calls it "the well-known portrait of Marija [Bursać]", so apparently it was published sometime before 1967. There is no evidence that it was published in 1939, but I don't see what it has to do with omitting Yugoslavia from the license. The photo was transferred to Commons and tagged by an admin (I suppose they know about licensing). Your claim that the Yugoslavia license should be removed and the B-H one left looks rather confused.
 * Actually, now I have read the text in those tags, and now I see what you meant by referring to those dates. Initially I thought it very strange to remove Yugoslavia and leave B-H, since the photo was surely first published in SFR Yugoslavia (which B-H was just a part of). Sorry for the confusion. Vladimir  (talk) 14:02, 16 June 2015 (UTC)
 * At the bottom of the Znaci gallery page, it says that all the documents that are published there are in the public domain. These WW2 photos come from the Museum of Yugoslav History, a part of which was formerly known as the Museum of Revolution (Muzej Revolucije). Some of the museum's photos came to Commons via USHMM, rather than Znaci. See for example PD tag on File:Kosta Pećanac, 20 October 1941.jpg.
 * I don't see why Croatia would have to be mentioned in that license. According to this, all Yugoslavia stamps issued before 1991 are PD. Vladimir  (talk) 17:54, 15 June 2015 (UTC)
 * would you mind have a quick look at the images used in this article and provide a second opinion? Thanks, Peacemaker67 (crack... thump) 01:44, 16 June 2015 (UTC)
 * File:Marija_Bursać.jpg: without a known earlier publication we can't use the Yugoslavia tag - and we don't need it, as the Bosnia tag is sufficient to demonstrate its PD status in the US (PD in Bosnia before 1996). But if we can't prove 1939 publication that note should be removed from the URAA tag.
 * File:Žetva_u_Saničkoj_dolini_(1942).jpg: the website doesn't specify in what country the image is PD - we need to demonstrate that it is public domain in at least the US. Without a known publication date we can't do that because we don't know if it was PD at the URAA date. The same problem aplies to File:Partizanke_na_Dinari_(1943).jpg.
 * File:Marija_Bursać_1984_Yugoslavia_stamp.jpg: government works from Yugoslavia are now governed by the laws of all of its successor states. Nikkimaria (talk) 14:33, 16 June 2015 (UTC)

Thanks, Nikki. Peacemaker67 (crack... thump) 09:16, 17 June 2015 (UTC)
 * I think I addressed the prose issues. Fixed File:Marija Bursać.jpg and File:Marija Bursać 1984 Yugoslavia stamp.jpg; tagged the latter with Gov templates for those Yugoslav republics that have them. Vladimir  (talk) 17:29, 18 June 2015 (UTC)
 * Prose all good now. Given Nikki's opinion is the same as mine regarding the lack of publication date on the other two images, they will have to go. Cheers, Peacemaker67 (crack... thump) 03:41, 19 June 2015 (UTC)
 * I replaced them. Vladimir  (talk) 19:17, 19 June 2015 (UTC)
 * And those licences are good. Well done, passing. Peacemaker67 (crack... thump) 23:13, 19 June 2015 (UTC)
 * Thanks, Peacemaker67! Vladimir  (talk) 15:47, 20 June 2015 (UTC)