Talk:Marina Amaral

promotional?
Your claims are without merit. If you don't like the sources used, please explain. I reverted Amaral's edits to this article in order to avoid this article being an advertisement. Chris Troutman ( talk ) 19:38, 19 January 2018 (UTC)
 * Dear Chris, I regret about what I pointed on the summary, after checking Amaral's promotional references (an absolute COI) had been deleted. Now, however, I have to still insist in that it doesn't gather any actions that could make Amaral stand out and therefore I consider her page non profitable for Wikipedia. As yourself pointed, it's better to wait "50 years and write a real article" until Amaral deserves (if she does) to have an article. Since as far as I know none of use can predict the future, I'm nominating the article for deletion. Keep a copy on your user page for the future. It's not my intention to start an edit war, so let's see if a third person can interfere. PS: More things to point out: she's not a colorist, but a colorizer. Really different things. Regards, Macesito (talk) 19:54, 19 January 2018 (UTC)
 * I agree, AfD is the best method to iron this out. Thanks for your explanation. Chris Troutman  ( talk ) 20:52, 19 January 2018 (UTC)
 * Why are you PROD'ing the article instead of sending it to AfD? You know that I am opposed to deletion so how could you think this action is uncontroversial? Chris Troutman  ( talk ) 20:56, 19 January 2018 (UTC)
 * Fixed. Macesito (talk) 21:25, 19 January 2018 (UTC)

Sirlanz
Thanks for your interest in my work! I see although it already survived AfD once and you failed to create an actual second AfD discussion. Before I begin to suspect wiki-harrassment, I suggest you make corrections. Chris Troutman ( talk ) 18:34, 2 April 2019 (UTC)
 * I was not aware there had been an AfD already and I would not have bothered tilting at windmills if I'd known. How a colorist with one unremarkable work with her illustrations in it meets any sort of notability beats me.  The article is highly PROMO.  sirlanz 18:52, 2 April 2019 (UTC)
 * Maybe it's the multiple instances of articles like this one, or this one? Just a thought.ThatMontrealIP (talk) 07:57, 3 April 2019 (UTC)