Talk:Marina Garcia Marmolejo

Albanian article
I'm removing the reduced version of this. There are two many things wrong with it. First, the NYT doesn't allege anything. The NYT reported the allegation of the witness. Second, without more context, what is there to make of the assertion that's in there now? True, someone could read the source, but the assertion has no apparent basis for being in the article. Third, although Demiurge left in the assertion (after editing it), I agree with his comments on BLPN that the material simply doesn't belong in the article. It's too tangential to Marmolejo, her legal career, and her nomination. Why are we picking this particular case out of all of her cases to report on? Just because it received a mention in the NYT. That's not enough.

The material should be left out until there's a consensus either here or on BLPN that it belongs.--Bbb23 (talk) 22:49, 12 August 2011 (UTC)


 * Agreed. A note that that discussion is currently at WP:BLPN, or will be in the searchable archives of that page once it's archived. --Demiurge1000 (talk) 22:54, 12 August 2011 (UTC)