Talk:Marina Lee

Untitled
Let's not forget that the article referenced in endnote 1 says that documents "suggest" Lee was a involved in espionage and endnote 4 says that the accusation leveled against this woman are flimsy at best and would never hold up in court. Should the article then not say that her acts of espionage are "alleged"? Kmooreist (talk) 17:24, 1 September 2010 (UTC)kmooreist
 * German spies even ratted her out, the evidence is overwhelming :) WritersCramp (talk) 00:38, 3 September 2010 (UTC)

Copyright problem
At creation, Corensearchbot tagged this article for content copied with minimal alteration from the copyrighted source:

As originally created, the article said:

Changes here are minimal and sectins are copied verbatim. This is a clear violation of our copyright policy.

The content was altered, but insufficiently here (bolding added to highlight completely copied content):

While facts are not copyrightable, creative elements of presentation - including both structure and language - are. So that it will not constitute a derivative work, this content will need to be rewritten if it is to be retained. The essay Close paraphrasing contains some suggestions for rewriting that may help avoid these issues. The article Wikipedia Signpost/2009-04-13/Dispatches, while about plagiarism rather than copyright concerns, also contains some suggestions for reusing material from sources that may be helpful, beginning under "Avoiding plagiarism".

Alternatively, if the material can be verified to be public domain or permission is provided, we can use the original text with proper attribution. --Moonriddengirl (talk) 14:05, 7 September 2010 (UTC)