Talk:Marion M. Steen

development
Try. -- do ncr  am  15:50, 9 June 2011 (UTC)


 * An editor has removed the specifics of addresses and multiple attribution and other info within the list of works in this article. I think the info is useful and it is unreasonable to remove it.  There's no lack of space here.  Returning to article. -- do  ncr  am  21:30, 9 June 2011 (UTC)


 * SarekOfVulcan, what on earth are you thinking, to remove the detail twice now? It is routine in well-developed architect articles to include such detail.  It is arbitrary/unreasonable to remove.  I restored again, and am continuing with some completing out of attribution information that is entirely relevant here. -- do  ncr  am  21:34, 9 June 2011 (UTC)
 * Oh, really? You don't say.-- SarekOfVulcan (talk) 21:47, 9 June 2011 (UTC)

The details were unnecessary, Sarek was right. However, so was a list and repeated citations unnecessary when it should have been done in prose. Date of building is far more important to mention! A pity though that more time didn't go into this article... HIs father was also a notable architect.♦ Dr. Blofeld  21:44, 11 June 2011 (UTC)