Talk:Maritime Delimitation in the Black Sea case

80% of area does not mean 80% of oil and gas reserves
Indeed, EUobserver states that The verdict - which cannot be appealed - means Romania can exploit 80 percent of the 100 billion cubic metres of gas and 15 million tonnes of crude oil in the disputed zone, leaving the rest to Ukraine. But it would be correct if the reserves are evenly distributed over the area. There is no evidence that this is the case. If a journalist from EUobserver made a mistake or unjustified assertion, it is not a reason to repeat it here. We have to use common sence while editing articles.--AndriyK (talk) 15:28, 5 February 2009 (UTC)
 * True, it is very whisfull thinking and a Ukrainian official says something completely different... until it is investigated 100% nobody can be sure about this sort of things... — Mariah-Yulia (talk) 17:36, 5 February 2009 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Maritime Delimitation in the Black Sea case. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.icj-cij.org/icjwww/idocket/iru/iru_applications/iru_applications.pdf
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110716061754/http://www.interfax.com.ua/eng/main/7163/ to http://www.interfax.com.ua/eng/main/7163/
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20091018083723/http://www.ukranews.com/eng/article/178853.html to http://www.ukranews.com/eng/article/178853.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 03:02, 3 June 2017 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Maritime Delimitation in the Black Sea case. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090205045804/http://www.icj-cij.org/docket/files/132/14985.pdf to http://www.icj-cij.org/docket/files/132/14985.pdf
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20150416202430/http://www.icj-cij.org/docket/files/132/14987.pdf to http://www.icj-cij.org/docket/files/132/14987.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 22:33, 17 January 2018 (UTC)