Talk:Marjorie Lynch/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: MaxnaCarta (talk · contribs) 01:50, 8 May 2023 (UTC)

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)

(Criteria marked are unassessed)
 * 1) It is reasonably well written.
 * a. (prose, spelling, and grammar):
 * b. (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
 * 1) It is factually accurate and verifiable.
 * a. (reference section):
 * b. (citations to reliable sources):
 * c. (OR):
 * d. (copyvio and plagiarism):
 * 1) It is broad in its coverage.
 * a. (major aspects):
 * b. (focused):
 * 1) It follows the neutral point of view policy.
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * 1) It is stable.
 * No edit wars, etc.:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
 * a. (images are tagged and non-free content have non-free use rationales):
 * b. (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/fail:
 * 1) It is broad in its coverage.
 * a. (major aspects):
 * b. (focused):
 * 1) It follows the neutral point of view policy.
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * 1) It is stable.
 * No edit wars, etc.:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
 * a. (images are tagged and non-free content have non-free use rationales):
 * b. (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/fail:
 * No edit wars, etc.:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
 * a. (images are tagged and non-free content have non-free use rationales):
 * b. (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/fail:
 * b. (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/fail:
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/fail:
 * Pass/fail:

Lead
 * Linked London
 * Changed "American Army" to United States Army, as this is how it's referred to in Early life and should be consistent, also linked
 * Linked Washington DC
 * Lead is good, no issues. Summarises the body without excessive detail.

Early life
 * Linked London
 * Linked Paris
 * Linked Christmas
 * Source to text integrity for first two sentences of early life using ref [1] is good.
 * Ditto for first and second sentence of paragraph two
 * Linked US Army and changed to United States

Political career
 * Source to text integrity for paraph one checks out for the use of ref [9]
 * Ditto for [17], [20], [25].

General Comments
 * I really struggled to find fault with this one. A few missing links, but this is great work. You certainly practice what you preach about attention to detail and text to source integrity ! Did not find a single spelling error, and prose is excellent. Learned a lot from you during your review of my work and vice versa. Appreciate it. Thanks! — MaxnaCarta  ( 💬 • 📝 ) 06:18, 12 May 2023 (UTC)