Talk:Marjorie Monaghan

Fair use rationale for Image:Tessa Number One.jpg
Image:Tessa Number One.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 04:52, 30 November 2007 (UTC)

It is just a picture. Take a chill pill. --68.185.114.225 (talk) 16:32, 28 August 2011 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination
I am declining the CSD nomination. Notability is claimed, by stating that she has had major roles in a number of network TV programs. Google News archive shows coverage in a number of reviews of programs such as "Rescue 77" and "Babylon 5." Take it to AFD if you disagree. CSD is inapplicable where ther is a rational claim of notability, as there is here. Edison (talk) 17:53, 12 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Do not repeatedly add PRODs. They may only be used for noncontested deletions. AFD is the next route if someone wishes to delete the article. Please look at the Google News results cited above before taking it to AFD. It is only necessary that substantial coverage exists in multiple reliable and independent sources to ward off AFD, not that the article be perfected with every source incorporated and cited. Edison (talk) 18:09, 12 December 2008 (UTC)

"California Born" American Actress?
The way that is stated at the start of the page almost makes it sound like California is its own country, rather than a state. I'm recommending that it be changed to "is an American actress born in ________, California..." etc etc. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 73.96.106.201 (talk) 23:36, 2 April 2019 (UTC)