Talk:Mark Clifford

untitled
The article has now been updated and fully referenced, except for his educational background, for which I was unable to find sources. Can anyone (the person who put that in) please cite sources for this information? Thanks Ohconfucius 02:27, 27 March 2007 (UTC)

Seems like this page is quite biased and probably written by an ex-employee. This page is not representative of Mark Clifford at all. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Aic09 (talk • contribs) 18:29, 29 March 2010 (UTC)

This is one instance where removal of sourced material, ostensibly for WP:NPOV, seems to impinge on WP:CENSOR. Ohconfucius ¡digame! 01:54, 31 March 2010 (UTC)

Simply a move towards less bias - as stated above, that is the problem here. The majority of the page does not need to be taken up with the overblown details of a couple of incidents within his career, (and the sole picture to explicitly relate to one of the incidents) as that really belongs - and should stay- in the blogs you cited. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Aic09 (talk • contribs) 03:12, 1 April 2010 (UTC)
 * I do see your point that the SCMP section is overweight on the controversy surrounding his departure. I don't entirely agree about the image, which I think is a centrepiece of the section, but I won't revert. Ohconfucius  ¡digame! 04:13, 1 April 2010 (UTC)

WP:BLP1E
The only substantive third-party sourcing I'm seeing in this article is over the subeditor sackings. WP:BLP1E would appear to apply. HrafnTalkStalk(P) 07:06, 14 May 2012 (UTC)