Talk:Mark Konkol

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Mark Konkol. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110523061406/http://blogs.suntimes.com/neighborhoods/2007/04/historic_pullman_like_living_i.html to http://blogs.suntimes.com/neighborhoods/2007/04/historic_pullman_like_living_i.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 10:27, 3 June 2017 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Mark Konkol. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20150815094601/http://www.dnainfo.com/chicago/ to http://www.dnainfo.com/chicago/
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130203190220/http://www.dnainfo.com/chicago/about-us/our-team/editorial-team/mark-konkol to http://www.dnainfo.com/chicago/about-us/our-team/editorial-team/mark-konkol

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 06:36, 3 November 2017 (UTC)

Tenure at Chicago Reader
I’m not a regular editor, but I looked up this guy and it appears that someone is scrubbing the fact that he was fired, let alone the circumstances under which he was fired. I’ve reverted it to be as inoffensive as possible, and leave it up to others to write up the controversial part, but the removal of *any* mention of the controversy suggests manipulation. Edit: the person removing this has only ever used their account to remove that section of text, going back four years. I think it might be Mark Konkol. Edit 2: this person also scrubbed entire the personal section claiming it’s “outdated” while citing no sources. This is definitely him, right? 2600:6C40:7500:1173:482C:818B:D189:6FD2 (talk) 00:48, 27 January 2022 (UTC)