Talk:Mark Mattson

Neutrality Dispute
I'd like to first say that I have absolutely no doubts as to the calibre of this scientist & his achievements, having read quite a lot of his work as a PhD student. However, this article is badly structured and reads like a university publicity page and could really do with being toned down in terms of the language used.

I will have a look over this page and see if I can make some improvements over the next week or so - please feel free to challenge me on any adjustments I make.

86.137.47.132 (talk) 09:02, 7 August 2012 (UTC)

Speedy nominated
This page is awful and indicative of self-promotional puffery. Should be deleted in full. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Epigrammatist (talk • contribs)

COI or paid editing?
,, Some strange edits appears to be going on with this page via this account LogicandProportion and on the intermittent fasting article, any idea what to do here? He's re-written most of this article. It looks like conflict of interest. Pinging you all because you know about this topic more than me. Psychologist Guy (talk) 19:05, 5 January 2020 (UTC)


 * I have just removed all his edits, per conflict of interest and other problems. Psychologist Guy (talk) 19:22, 5 January 2020 (UTC)
 * Thanks. It did look a lot like COI and/or paid editing. - Scarpy (talk) 18:20, 6 January 2020 (UTC)


 * unfortunately LogicandProportion won't give up, he's restored the content 3 times now. This is definitely bad COI. Psychologist Guy (talk) 01:55, 8 January 2020 (UTC)