Talk:Mark Speight/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

--  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 17:41, 19 December 2008 (UTC)
 * I've decided to fail the article, since its a week and a half since the GA review. If the statements above can be addressed, then the article may be renominated for GA. --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 22:37, 28 December 2008 (UTC)


 * Most of the above has been addressed (overlinking, red links, death date in last section). icBirmingham is the website of a newspaper, so passes WP:RS. I don't see what wrong with "get[ting] married in fancy dress" (the phrase anyway), could you perhaps explain what the problem is? Nev1 (talk) 22:56, 28 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Excellent. To me, the sentence is very odd to have, that's what comes from me. But, I guess its alright to have in the section. Thank you to Nev1 for getting the stuff I left at the talk page, because I have gone off and placed the article as GA. Congrats. ;) --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 23:33, 28 December 2008 (UTC)