Talk:Marketing automation

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment
This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 7 September 2021 and 23 December 2021. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Nguyen222. Peer reviewers: Tesjes167, JKnoepke.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 00:36, 18 January 2022 (UTC)

Scolding
If you want to split tables out on separate pages please make sure to leave intact the accuracy of the information in the article and properly link the tables back to their definitions correctly - do not delete key information and link the tables incorrectly.

64.55.143.226 (talk) 15:56, 5 November 2009 (UTC)

Proposed merge with Mobile marketing automation
Although marketing automation and mobile marketing automation may sound similar - they are in fact very different. I am happy to add a lot of content.

Not enough material for a separate article.  DGG ( talk ) 22:18, 8 April 2015 (UTC)

These are very different software sectors with very different purposes. I can add more content clarifying each. John Koetsier (VP Research, VentureBeat) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Johnkoetsier (talk • contribs) 21:12, 7 October 2015 (UTC)
 * Closing stale proposal with no consensus for the merge. Klbrain (talk) 07:28, 9 September 2017 (UTC)

It could be integrated as Mobile Marketing Automation is in fact a branch of Marketing Automation (MA), so is email MA, Inbound MA or by definition any other automation related to MKTG. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 185.13.78.11 (talk) 19:32, 7 September 2018 (UTC)

Enterprise marketing management
The redirects Enterprise marketing management and Marketing operations management to the current version of the article gives WP:SURPRISE and therefore makes no sense. Djm-leighpark (talk) 19:43, 18 May 2019 (UTC)

Magic quadrant necessary?
I saw this has been added to the page, but it's behind a paid link. You can't actually read the list from the link given. Should it be kept, revised, or removed? SportsGuy17 (talk) 16:12, 30 November 2021 (UTC)
 * there's nothing wrong with paid links--many people can help find them--, but the Gartner Magic Quadrant is not much in the way of evidnce for notability. I count it as a non=specfic promotional  gimmick.