Talk:Marketing warfare strategies

Learning from Napoleon
This section is factually wrong, e.g the smaller Greek unit was not the cohort but the lochos, and they were not all arms combined arms units. If anything it is the pre-Marian reform Roman legion which is the all arms force.see Combined_arms. However the Legion could be all arms because there were 5000 of them not 100. And a cohort was not 100 but something more like 480 or 6 centuries ,and a century was not a 100 men unit but 80.

However I have refrained from editing this article, because the writers of this article may be acurately quoting from a source book or group who rather than try and get the facts right, has opted for big (but wrong) comparisons between military history and marketing. If this is true, given the number of fellow military geeks on wikipedia, I suggest that someone put a lock on this article, and make it clear that you know that these facts are wrong, but that was what it was those espousing marketing war strategies that got the facts wrong, and provide the references of those sources.Koonan the almost civilised 10:41, 18 May 2007 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Marketing warfare strategies. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20160320125209/http://blog.ezyinsights.com/ to http://blog.ezyinsights.com/
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20160320125209/http://blog.ezyinsights.com/ to http://blog.ezyinsights.com/
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20071013084147/http://www.attilascamp.com/ to http://www.attilascamp.com/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 17:54, 3 June 2017 (UTC)