Talk:Marlborough gem

Suggested re-structuring
Informative article, but I found it diffusive if not disorganized as a reference article. I think it would be more useful if re-written into sections on (1) its description, (2) history, & (3) influence on art. BTW, are there any theories how Rubens came to own this item? -- llywrch (talk) 16:45, 17 February 2014 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Marlborough gem. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110726162958/http://www.dicamillocompanion.com/Houses_hgpm.asp?ID=237 to http://www.dicamillocompanion.com/Houses_hgpm.asp?ID=237
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20091015093525/http://www.liverpoolmuseums.org.uk/ladylever/collections/wedgwood/johnflaxman.asp to http://www.liverpoolmuseums.org.uk/ladylever/collections/wedgwood/johnflaxman.asp

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 19:17, 18 January 2018 (UTC)