Talk:Marquess Curzon of Kedleston

Tag
There was a merge tag on this page; there was no explanation given, and no discussion opened here, so I've deleted it. For the record, there is no justification for such a merge; this title and the other one proposal are (or were) two different honours. The only thing they had in common was that they were briefly held by the same person. I've re-written the article a bit to make this clearer. Swanny18 (talk) 18:02, 16 December 2010 (UTC)

Redirect
I just reverted a redirect for the exact reason expressed in the comment by Swanny18, above.--Jimbo Wales (talk) 12:20, 11 May 2012 (UTC)
 * This is the system normally used for peerage articles. An extinct title redirects to an extant lower title, for instance Duke of Bolton redirects to Marquess of Winchester and Marquess of Dalhousie redirects to Earl of Dalhousie. In the Viscount Scarsdale article you get a full overview of the titles held by the Curzon and their descent. The different remainders for the various peerages granted to Lord Curzon are also described in much more detail than in the brief article on the marquessate. I also couldn't find any material of note in the article on the marquessate that was not included in the Viscount Scarsdale article, as you claim. I suggest the system used for other peerage articles should also be used here, i. e. the article Marquess Curzon of Kedleston should redirect to Viscount Scarsdale. Regards, Tryde (talk) 06:13, 13 May 2012 (UTC)
 * No reply here so I'm going to redirect this article to Viscount Scarsdale according to the normal system used for peerage articles. Tryde (talk) 17:27, 20 May 2012 (UTC)