Talk:Martha E. Pollack

A Commons file used on this page has been nominated for speedy deletion
The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page has been nominated for speedy deletion: You can see the reason for deletion at the file description page linked above. —Community Tech bot (talk) 19:06, 8 December 2018 (UTC)
 * MEP-smaller-version.jpg

Edits re Pollack's comments on the Gaza war
Apparently it is necessary to do this:

My own opinion is that adding commentary about precisely how carefully Pollack did or did not word her comments on the war and micro-reading (from that lack of precision) inferences about her opinions about the war is WP:UNDUE. But if you disagree, and want to add this content to the article, you must be an established editor to do so. User:Trimesterfour and User:Macintoshgrannysmith: this means you are ineligible.

Of course, the bulk of the content of this article is unrelated to the war and unaffected by these arbitration remedies. —David Eppstein (talk) 00:49, 17 October 2023 (UTC)
 * Now that Cornell has been mentioned in a Ways and Means Committee letter suggesting they could lose their accreditation over the controversy, [the ARBPIA notice] does seem necessary, though I regret seeing the PIA umbrella spread so far. – SJ + 17:39, 11 January 2024 (UTC)
 * Some article about a politician grandstanding, that barely name-drops Pollack, does not necessitate any coverage at all in the article about Pollack. —David Eppstein (talk) 17:53, 11 January 2024 (UTC)
 * Agreed. Just noting that ref on this page as members of Congress may join the attacks on Cornell. – SJ +  07:03, 12 January 2024 (UTC)