Talk:Martin Crandall

Removal of material
Why was mention of his assault charges removed? It had reputable sources cited. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 12.168.25.203 (talk) 23:25, 21 January 2008 (UTC)

Why does Knitwits keep changing it to remove the part about the assault. Events widely known and published in the media with first-hand sources need to be left as they are an important part of a biography. If you are a fan of the artist or the band, that doesn't give you the right to remove negative facts about the person. If Knitwits keeps changing this back, I'm going to seek a third opinion. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.90.155.55 (talk) 18:51, 22 January 2008 (UTC)

Third opinion
I've warned about the removal. While the information should be included here, I wish that there was more information on Crandall. The inclusion of the information puts in a little too much WP:UNDUE weight on the issue. I'd advise both of you to try to add more to the page. &mdash;  Hello Annyong  (say whaaat?!) 00:41, 3 February 2008 (UTC)