Talk:Martin Gottlieb

No COI, neutral point of view and secondary sources listed. I thanked orangemike for his diligence but believe that the charges asserted for blocking the account(loebfellow) come from my incompetence with Wikipedia not from malfeasance. I do not work for Gottlieb, nor Loeb (was enthusiastic loebfellow hence the name.) After reading an article about the shortage of women participating on wikipedia, I decided to give it a go. I have expertise in a number of areas that might be of interest to Wikipedia users. There is no bias, no paid relationship with subject, his publisher (?),or with Loeb. Just a series of bumbling learning curve mistakes. This is why I made so many entries (largely to correct Wikipedia spacing and sourcing issues. I can understand orangemike's worry that the trail was a mile long..) What you noticed was sheer incompetence on my part. I am clearly not a nimble enough participant but do hope that you'll read the text to see that there is no COI and that secondary sources are used. Thank you.(Pixstories (talk) 23:50, 11 December 2013 (UTC))

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Martin Gottlieb. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20111009174915/http://humanities.princeton.edu/journalism/faculty.html to http://humanities.princeton.edu/journalism/faculty.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 07:53, 4 June 2017 (UTC)