Talk:Martin Grams Jr.

Fair use rationale for Image:Railroadhr.jpg
Image:Railroadhr.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot 23:50, 25 October 2007 (UTC)

External links modified (January 2018)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Martin Grams Jr.. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070204075759/http://www.labyrinth.net.au/%7Emuffin/suspense_c.html to http://www.labyrinth.net.au/~muffin/suspense_c.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 10:22, 19 January 2018 (UTC)

COI tag (May 2021)
Language in edit summary removing some sort of a joke edit suggests the editor has a vested interest in the subject--they took things more personally than we see when other silly edits are removed DiamondRemley39 (talk) 12:24, 13 May 2021 (UTC)

Notability
The article is a good candidate for deletion as it doesn't quite meet the notability criteria. But as I recognize the contributions Grams has made to OTR history as being not unlike that of Dunning, Schaden, et al--just in the era of smaller presses and individual books vs. encyclopedias--I won't nominate. I'd advise the key contributor(s) to the article to stop adding to this article, especially without valid secondary sources to support claims. Consider adding articles to be used as sources to the talk page here, or on my user talk page. Peace. DiamondRemley39 (talk) 15:13, 13 May 2021 (UTC)