Talk:Martin Zweig

Fair use rationale for Image:MartinZweigBookcover.jpg
Image:MartinZweigBookcover.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 04:52, 6 June 2007 (UTC)

Who Deleted Most of the Content This Article Originally Had?
Was this article the victim of User:Ave Caesar who apparently last year (2008) initiated a nomination for deletion of this article? I have not gone through most of the contributions to the article but the content looks sparse considering all of the contributors that have been involved and its beginning length when the article was conceived. I am not a fan of the super-rich but whoever nominated this article for deletion on the basis that the person is not notable, is only showing their (to put it very minimally), lack of knowledge and literacy. All they had to do was a Google Search and they would have come up with more than 68,000 entries - hardly unnotable... Anyway, this article may need to have restored to it, much of this information that seems to have disappeared over time... Stevenmitchell (talk) 06:29, 25 August 2009 (UTC)

You hit the nail on the head. I read this article about a year ago and what remains is a ghost of what it once was. It's just terrible compared with its previous incarnation. green228 —Preceding unsigned comment added by 58.9.169.185 (talk) 14:50, 26 September 2010 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Martin Zweig. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100119032037/http://www.zweigmodel.com/ to http://www.zweigmodel.com/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 11:34, 4 June 2017 (UTC)