Talk:Martinlutherking.org

What exactly is racist about the website? I read it and saw nothing of the sort. 71.236.33.2 20:29, 2 June 2006 (UTC)


 * It deals with one of the most important black leaders in history. Denigrating him with non-existential evidence (as the files are yet to be revealed to the public), comparing him losely to communist leaders and to the extent of repeatedly using chauvinisms such as that he should not be revered because "he supposedly cheated on his wife". Wheres the logic in that?, i just cant really see the connection between all the good he did in his life and he being adulterous. what is it that bothers them about Luther King jr.?, one doesnt have to go far to realise that its nothing but primitive, ignorant and chauvinist racism. If you didnt saw any racism there, i suggest a closer look to it (it even goes to the extent of attacking jews as well, its a work of art in hatred and racism).
 * Why was this merged into the entry for Stormfront? Was there any discussion of this? Lijil 10:02, 9 October 2006 (UTC)

Irony
Ironically the wikipedia links probably increase its Google rank. Definitely racist, but interesting for getting an idea of what people who feel this way are saying. - Peregrinefisher 07:00, 31 July 2006 (UTC)