Talk:Marvel Ultimate Collection, Complete Epic and Epic Collection lines

ISBN Numbers?
I feel like every new entry should have to include a valid ISBN number when it's added, to validate its addition and avoid fake entries. Harryhenry1 (talk) 06:29, 19 August 2022 (UTC)

Not a terrible idea, feel free to start adding them. There are a lot that aren't always know if course. Nickpheas (talk) 21:38, 11 October 2022 (UTC)

Time to split the page?
It strikes me that this page is becoming both unwieldy and listing three distinct types of books which don't have an awful lot in common. The Epic Collections are the active line right now. I don't know if there are books released under the other brandings, but they're not common, compared with three or four Epic Collections every month. It would make sense to me to give Epic Collections off into their own page and leave the (fairly static) remainder. The main thing they have in common is the names. Nickpheas (talk) 21:43, 11 October 2022 (UTC)
 * Edited to remove autocorrect errorsNickpheas (talk) 10:05, 19 April 2023 (UTC)


 * I think that would be a good idea, especially now that Modern Epics are a thing and seem to have replaced the Complete Collections. Keep this page with the ongoing lines - Epics and Modern Epics - and create another page for the Complete/Ultimate Collections. 189.35.241.37 (talk) 11:42, 24 November 2022 (UTC)

Yes please that would be a great idea — Preceding unsigned comment added by 90.249.0.254 (talk) 18:35, 14 April 2024 (UTC)

Namor Edit
I would argue that the "material from" tag is accurate for the Strange Tales and Tales to Astonish issues. The titles were split books at the time. The Epic Collection only contains the stories that had Namor. Strange Tales #107 had non-super-hero tales. Strange Tales #125 had a Doctor Strange story. The Tales to Astonish issues were split with the Hulk. Adhmlh (talk) 22:06, 22 February 2024 (UTC)